|
… INFORMED VOTERS DECIDE THE ISSUES I – Wildomar Council At Large |
| 13/13 100.00% |
| Vote Count | Percent | |
| YES | 1,118 | 59.40% |
| NO | 764 | 40.60% |
| Total | 1,882 | 100.00% |
| J – Wildomar Council By District |
| 13/13 100.00% |
| Vote Count | Percent | |
| NO | 1,466 | 79.63% |
| YES | 375 | 20.37% |
| Total | 1,841 | 100.00% |
| K – Wildomar Council From Districts |
| 13/13 100.00% |
| Vote Count | Percent | |
| NO | 1,538 | 83.77% |
| YES | 298 | 16.23% |
| Total | 1,836 | 100.00% |
The stats shown above were deftly lifted from the Riverside County Registrar of Voters’ website.
The voters of Wildomar wisely put a contentious issue to rest by voting to choose their future city councils “At Large,” where everyone gets to vote for eveyone. Makes sense to Zak.
Given time to contemplate all of the meaningless ramifications of districts, the voters of Wildomar approved the citywide election protocol by a larger percentage than originally voted for Measure D, and soundly rejected districts, which should cool the shrill howls of district supporters but probably won’t. Obviously, the voters didn’t listen to the howlers and any threats of legal action by litigious activists would be anti-democratic.
The informed majority of voters has spoken. Give it a rest.
Just because LAFCO says Wildomar could have districts, doesn’t mean Wildomar should.
Congratulations to Wildomar for using their common sense. It bodes well for our future.
Shrill howls may be made directly to Zak, as comments are permitted. Since Zak gets to approve them before they are seen, any comments about Zak’s challenged wardrobe and his personal life will be deleted. Ironically, Wildomar Magazine ain’t a democracy. It’s just a blog. ”Beyond blogging”, to be candid.
And being read daily by a lot of interested folks.

Posted by wildomarmagazine 
Posted by wildomarmagazine 

Posted by wildomarmagazine 







